Notification Center
Turn on/off sound
Show/Hide Coins Ticker
 6 Gwei
🐌 Slow 👌 Standard ⚡️ Fast
6 Gwei 6 Gwei 6 Gwei
~120 secs ~60 secs ~15 secs
Trollbox

Tomorrow, around 2pm Paris time. Be here.

I have one opportunity for you.

To noobs: Don't be - miss out.

(who cares, BCW will be here)

Cheers!
D Man

From one mighty project founder. The OGs agree, BCW is #1!

ULTIMATELY... to prove loyalty, to have utmost respect, you must do what none of those greedy cunts is willing to do - and that is - to put your community before just wallet.

I got informed today "D Man, you made basically anti-sales pitch for this month's membership" - SO WHAT?

I said that this month, of all months is best one to skip Premium membership in BCW if you can't easily afford it.

How will you believe me when is the best month if I won't tell you the worst month?

duuh!

This month, I expect reddish, non productive for alts.

So why recommend Mr. W who is for alts?
Leverage is wild, why recommend Mr. M who had reduced performance (but still consistently printing positive) for basically since the market turned bullish.

Mr. S is good, but for active traders. If you'll be waiting for crypto start triggering bullish, you don't need it this month.

Instead, I rather have you pump your capital, pump your energy, rest up... before we can have a go at things.

Sure, again, if you're smart you can read what I wrote... if you will participate on Market, just see Mr. S's daily update stats, I think his updates will help you a lot. If you will trade leverage, definitely check out Mr. M as well... and if you will be chasing alts, heck, I personally prefer to buy alts in shitty times as then I have a chance to buy slowly small alts that are otherwise hard to buy, or to good strong alts alts that I missed for a good entry price, then take Mr. W for your extra edge.

Brother, I don't make anti-sales pitch. I just inform you properly so you can decide.

Same shit tomorrow - tomorrow we have a cool thing in my opinion - a small coin that will launch even smaller, and thanks to team's willingness, we bought out earlier buyers, rearranged tokenomics to even more community friendly (less to team, less to airdrops - nothing - less to any potential hurting factors). Now why would I tell you "come, mooooon" when you know what I know: there will likely be reddish month. But, if not participated, the month will pass, and most in green days will miss our entry. IF you know you're not going anywhere in crypto, why not enter at good price, at no slippage... in industry that's quite hot, one of top just after AI which I think will be favorite in this cycle.

Again, I tell you how it is.

I tell you it's not a gem.

Because it isn't. To be Blockchain Whispers gem it requires a lot of edges at one group.

Even then, project can fail. I'm on top of our gems, checking in with the teams for you, and using our influence to max to steer them into good direction. Some teams do it by default and need almost no intervention, others need more intervention in form of me educating them about community, crypto etc.

Again, properly informed I think then you make your decision.

And then they wonder why people follow D Man wherever and why their huge following-number means nothing.

Roar my BCW lion, roar! You're the mighty one!
D Man

The difference between Twitter traders and D Man
(aka Why Is D Man so Respected and they are not)

First, their posts are not clear and trackable by any mean.

If they don't tell you when, where, etc... it is nothing.

If they say just bullish or bearish without timeframe, eventually even a broken clock would be right twice a day.

If they don't tell you magnitude.

If they don't admit when they are wrong.

If they are unable to fucking predict shit besides making artistic drawings.

For years, intentionally, my charts look like retarded child has drawn them.

Why?

Because my method is not within a trendline.

My method does not require more makeup than a Halloween hoe on a night out.

The difference between me and them is they don't love you.

And because they don't, they don't fucking care for you.

And because they don't, they fucking can't UNDERSTAND you.

I do.

And because I understand you, I know "fuck if he just bought some top alt, he might be considering topping up, if I tell him I expect a slight drop, I should tell him not to sell alt, as the drop will be small"... or "if I expect a big drop, I can tell him to sell alts, to rebuy lower" like I did.

I must tell you where I expect it, and WHEN and... importantly BEFORE WHAT (aka sort of stop) whether it's time, price or any other condition.

This year, I had successful date of drop. Direction (drop), magnitude (heck, it's still in play), then I had another DATE of drop; and before all that I had a public, free, right here, multi-notice to sell all alts and followed by a drop.

On top of this, I had for fun 100 or 1000 coins short signal issued, and all were correct. To prove a point.

This is Blockchain Whispers accuracy.
This is your D Man.

So why should I apologise for this? For quieting every distraction out there so I can serve you the best.

And yes to those who are not good however feel better if someone else fails. Eventually bro, I'm a player of odds, eventually I'll make an embarrassing mistake. I did. I do. I will. It's the name of the game.

But guess what, my BCW followers will stay true to me, because they see me here in bad, good and fucking stormy times. They have me here. Working as their edge.

This is what BCW is for.

So #1 BCW.
...
...
...
..
Many places nothing
...
...
then the rest.

The fact you follow means a lot. Cheers to you my Blockchain Whispers brother!

D Man

Years back my posts sounded cocky. I don't want to sound cocky when I reveal I've been thinking about bitcoin, bitcoin traders that I know of (and know many), I am by far the most PRECISE, attentive to the details, taking into account more factors than ANY trader that I know of.

Not perfect. Not all accurate. But I didn't see one single that outperforms me when full circle turn comes (bull+bear). Some work good in bullish pumps (many), some work well in sideways market... almost none of those traders predict market switches, and those that do, are so slow, and so macro oriented that they fail to time them to precision.


For example, this top, I predicted for you, almost to the very top. From there we have slow drops.

I announced that MONTHS ago, to precise days.

If you buy my OLD report from what January or February, basically Q1 report as I issued only one this year full report (and one mini after that) - it mentioned very date of March 15th. Open btc chart, this is when the drop happened.

ALL readers were NOT bullish anymore, even for two weeks before.

This level of accuracy is unseen in crypto, at least unseen with anyone who publicly offers his edge.

In the mini report, you knew about May drop... here's a free hint if you haven't bought, it will still drop lower.

Bro. I can't share bullish "wen moon, wen Lambo" news, because market is going down, but if I protect your ass(ets) now, you'll have more to multiply later, no?

This is what BCW is for.

And if I don't inform you of this, it slips you, in the ocean of loud traders.

D Man is the most accurate public trader on the planet. Period.

Arrogant or not. I am inviting anyone better, contact @cryptoalfred - state your terms, prove yourself to him (it will be private, non shared), if selected, prove yourself to the BCW for free (put your money where your mouth is) and if you pass both, your terms will be honored and you'll get one of greatest audience in cryptoverse.

Fair? Good.

I've made such challenges before. Found some good guys. Most guys who have no idea what they talk about.

Most if not all, failed when it came to cycle change, cycle switch and market behavior profile change.

Trust me, I am not interested in competing with my traders. I put them in first spotlight. I don't want to do signals. To me it's stressful.

And why is it stressful? Because I'm attentive.

Cold traders are good in many times, but not good when it matters.

Most traders nowdays use old TA that is already eaten by marketmaker's algos...

Most traders that know TA, their TA works within the range, not on extremes where it's most profit and loss made.

I have yet to see a trader with such longevity predicting clearly simply: "bitcoin will go down more" -

not even going into: "by Mar 15 we will have a big drop buckle up" or "May will be..."

You get my point?

Only D Man does it.
And luckily for you, D Man shares with you in free or premium form basically all his findings.

D Man is your man.

BCW baby!
D Man

The cool thing is tomorrow the sale of the opportunity thingy will be in red red days for crypto, most outsiders will be completely disinterested. We will be majority getting in the bottom. Noobs and others shaken by the market, or those who can't hold for a couple months also will not participate. I think the project will get respectable audience this way. Very good profiles.

D Man's Fundamental report is one of the best assistants you can have in trading. Again, this May's drop comes as surprise to many, but not BCW and especially not to the readers of D Man's Macro Fundamentals Report. Compliments to the buyers! (nothing to sell)

Mr. S finally managed to get me stats in one easy to understand image. You can get his premium package at: https://blockchainwhispers.com/premium/mr-s-circle for daily market updates.

The date is known for upcoming 2-3x opportunity, aka undergem :)

Thursday. Around this time, maybe a couple hrs earlier. Stay tuned please. I'll message about more precise time when I know it. Cheers!

D Man

The time for Premium has come.

I'll be the first to tell you, if you're tight on budget or energy not to take anything.

First of all, Mr. M, is very consistent, profitable on leverage, had a slow, weak, but profitable month. +400% or something, I'll send the dets soon.

I suggest you NOT to do any leverage. So by default you don't need Mr. M. BUT, if you'll do leverage, then I think his edge is good to have in your trades.

Link to Mr. M (and you get complimentary Mr. S) is
https://blockchainwhispers.com/premium/m-s

Regarding Mr. S - he has very accurate daily market predictions. He didn't send me properly his stats so fuck him, if he can't put stats in an image, I will not share with you ten pages of predictions. Anyway, very accurate. So if you're participating in market, wondering how particular daily event will play out - for me, I find him very useful when I want to check my own stuff.

You can get Mr. S individual package here:
https://blockchainwhispers.com/premium/mr-s-circle

And finally, Mr. W - you had free 15 days with him. The market didn't play out anything, but you saw his dedication and level of attention. If you think when alts start pumping you'll benefit from it, just renew, or go to this link:

Mr. W
https://blockchainwhispers.com/premium/mr-w-circle

I know this is anti-sales, but my first loyalty is to you. If of any months Premium should ever be skipped, it is likely this coming month. Boring, potentially bleeding...

so, IF YOU ARE participating on the market, then definitely take package that fits your trading best (individually trading - take Mr. S; leverage trading - take Mr. M; alts only - Mr. W) and enjoy.

Cheers!
D Man

What's the best country to live in D Man?


Brother - what prevents you from truly liberating yourself - travel. You don't need to live in one country.

I don't. For years.

You want chicks - you know where to go.

You want good nature - you know where to go.

Good people - where to go.

Be disciplined and feeling like shit - you also know where to go.

And where is that?

I let you discover.

The world is your oyster amigo!

D Man

My comp crashed. Now I'm back.

The request I noticed in chat was for discipline related post, and since it's actively going in my mind now, I can write about it.

Not to motivate you, because if you motivate a monkey you get what — a motivated monkey.

But to educate you.

Many of you are better disciplined than me. My own discipline was always a fight and feeling of guilt when I'm not productive, not the naturally flowing thing to do.

I noticed when I do work productive, but intellectual, stuff that needs analysis, focus, etc... I need to slow my body down. But when I slow my body down so my mind can be focused all day at analysis and stuff, I get so super lazy in physical life...

... and other way around.

When I'm in full thinking mode, I'm lazy to prep food, go outside, anything...

When I get into playful mode, it gets easy, I get on trainings, workouts, etc... but I feel guilt because hey, I'm not where I want to be and I'm afraid I'll forget all the open things I have in my mind that I want to do.

A friend told me when I was stressed over little bullshit that it helped him to write down all things that stress him.

I did.

It helped.

So whenever I have a bunch of shit I'm stressed about and not a big one, and I don't know how to solve the jittery feeling, I fucking write it down. Done.

Doesn't happen too often, but now I have a tool. I share it with you so it can help you as well.

Finally, the focus, the very wish of me going to the nature and changing the lifestyle a bit demotivated me from current lifestyle. But, I know my mission. I know the why. I know what I want to do for you for the BCW for the legacy, and I'm doing all these things that are already identified (market, macro, alts, research for new stuff, deals to get you an edge, staying on top). But I slowed down on expanding, and discovering new stuff. Like getting ready for the final cycle.

It's good also, I think.

And the fear and guilt of not being productive is good, because you blink, and there is a bull run and you don't know what the fuck is base chain, what the fuck is hot, what the fuck is fuktoken (lol)... you get my point?

Crypto is dynamic. Easiest is to maintain muscle tone by being regularly in shape, than to after years of pause decide to do 8 months like a pro.

I'm no expert at it. To me it's also a fight. So maybe my advice here is not to be listened, but only to motivate you, or to inspire your own solutions.

Cheers BCW brother!
D Man

Chat concluded. Was awesome. My computer crashed so when it gets back up, I will write a post about what I was asked about in the chat re:discipline. Cheers!

I miss you, let's do improvised chat if you're avail. (not a mission, if you're busy, skip this one), but if you have market related thoughts, things you wish to share, or any feedback regarding recent posts, I'm here... It will better direct me into what you want, need, and seek: https://blockchainwhispers.com/cryptochat

Recently you see me not as passionate, and not as present.

I am a bit frustrated with the low amount of real opportunities I am able to present you.

The markets are slow.

The noobs are on bullish-alert.

The retracement is within the counter, bullish macro cycle. (thus higher risk, lower gain to trade)

And there are no real gains that I can be excited to make you.

I found this thing I'm going to share with you in Thursday, however it's not a life-changing thing. It's a good deal in my opinion. It is a 'smart trade', and that's it.

In bear times, I'd push through such feelings, knowing, it's red all around. However, now, I think I'll be taking it easy so the moment our bull momentum comes, I'm ready, not already overheated.

I will watch the charts, stay present with btc, with alts... and research projects and opportunities.

There is no need to push for anything, but... BUT! the time for buying is I think within the following months.

Is it month, two or five... I don't know, but once the green dildos begin, those who are not in positions, will likely be late to the game.

Your D Man is here for you. A bit frustrated with the slow rhythm that we must endure now, but maybe it's good. As in calm, due to fear, which is good motivator, I am visualizing how the bull market might play out and how to recognize the right moments to pull out and leave BCW worthy legacy.

As my gramps used to say: "you gotta pull out when it's the sweetest"

He didn't know how right he was...

Cheers gramps!
D Man

Discussions

bpwi Lot of crypto projects now just using AI just to follow the hype actually their is no actual AI development. Just hype no real development most of the time using web2

cki8 Dear BMAN, I have around 100 MATIC. Can you please suggest if I need to sell them ?

cgfh 37owpddVFiECWSWbpyWXa1gUfrxrMBXsUa

cjgr It's quite good to see ORDI becoming a potential token & I hope it continues in this stride .

cfb4 https://blockchainwhispers.com/signals#7033

Load More

Aave Labs has released its strategic roadmap for 2030 that introduces several key initiatives, including the launch of Aave V4, a new visual identity, and expanded DeFi functionalities. The “Temp Check” proposal aims to gather the Aave community’s feedback on the proposed enhancements to advance the Aave protocol. Aave V4 At the heart of the […] The post Aave proposes upgrade to v4 in strategic 2030 roadmap appeared first on CryptoSlate.

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

World of Dypians (WOD) is proud to announce that it is part of an exclusive list of top-tier projects in chapter 2 of BNB Chain’s Airdrop Alliance Program. For the airdrop, World of Dypian is offering up to 1 million WOD tokens and $225,000 in Premium Subscriptions as rewards to eligible users. These rewards will […]

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

... Bloomberg reports April 28, 2024. Cosmetic ... Crypto washout sends bitcoin below $58,000 ahead of Fed decision ... Representations of cryptocurrency ...

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

The economy also remains surprisingly resilient: data compiled by Bloomberg Intelligence suggests that 81% of S&P 500 companies that have filed their ...

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

Watch GM Is Betting the Future Is Electric  Bloomberg

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

Market intelligence platform Kaiko Analytics reports that new competitors are chipping away at Tether’s (USDT) stablecoin dominance. In a new report titled “Tether Loses Market Share,” Kaiko Analytics says that the stablecoin issuer’s market share over centralized exchange platforms (CEXs) has dipped 13% year-to-date (YTD) due to the growth of rival dollar-pegged digital assets, such […] The post New Competitors Eating Away At Tether’s USDT Stablecoin Dominance: Kaiko Analytics appeared first on The Daily Hodl.

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

:::info This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license. Authors: (1) Jinrui Yang, School of Computing & Information Systems, The University of Melbourne (Email: [email protected]); (2) Timothy Baldwin, School of Computing & Information Systems, The University of Melbourne and Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence, UAE (Email: (tbaldwin,trevor.cohn)@unimelb.edu.au); (3) Trevor Cohn, School of Computing & Information Systems, The University of Melbourne. ::: Table of Links Abstract and Intro Background and Related Work Multi-EuP Experiments and Findings Language Bias Discussion Conclusion, Limitations, Ethics Statement, Acknowledgements, References, and Appendix 6 Conclusion In this paper, we introduce Multi-EuP, a novel dataset for multilingual information retrieval across 24 languages, collected from European Parliament debates. The demographic information provided by the Multi-EuP dataset serves a dual purpose: not only does it contribute to multilingual retrieval tasks, but it also holds significant potential for advancing research in the realm of fairness and bias. This dataset can play a pivotal role in investigating issues of equitable representations and mitigation of biases within document ranking settings. \ \ Multi-EuP facilitates diverse information retrieval (IR) scenarios, encompassing one-vs-one, one-vs-many, and many-vs-many settings. We demonstrated the utility of Multi-EuP as a benchmark for evaluating both monolingual and multilingual IR. Our study reveals the presence of language bias in multilingual IR when employing BM25. We further validate the effectiveness of mitigating this bias through the strategic implementation of whitespace as a language tokenizer. \ We propose to conduct future work in three main areas. First, we intend to expand our investigation of language bias to encompass a broader range of ranking methods, including neural methods such as mDPR (Zhang et al., 2021), mColBERT (Lawrie et al., 2023) and PLAID-X(Santhanam et al., 2022). Second, we will expand the dataset by developing an automated API to retrieve data published by the European Parliament (EP), thereby ensuring realtime synchronization of our dataset. Lastly, our current experiments have explored language bias only, but we plan to further investigate gender bias, age bias, and nationality bias. Limitations The limitations of the Multi-EuP dataset are notable but navigable. Primarily, the temporal coverage of the dataset is confined to the past three years. This temporal constraint arises due to the fact that, preceding 2020, documents released by the EU were predominantly available in mono-lingual versions only. However, a potential remedy lies in the amalgamation of the Europarl (Koehn, 2005) collection, enabling a more comprehensive and holistic MultiEuP dataset. \ Furthermore, it is worth noting the domain skew of the dataset, in that Multi-EuP inevitably centers on political matters. While this presents challenges, particularly in terms of the intricate nuances of political language, it inherently serves as an excellent foundational stepping stone for delving into the intricacies of multilingual retrieval. We believe, however, that this dataset can serve as a launching pad for broader explorations encompassing crossdomain and open-domain transfer learning scenarios, thus contributing to the broader landscape of language understanding and retrieval. Ethics Statement The dataset contains publicly-available EP data that does not include personal or sensitive information, with the exception of information relating to public officeholders, e.g., the names of the active members of the European Parliament, European Council, or other official administration bodies. The collected data is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. [8] Acknowledgements This research was funded by Melbourne Research Scholarship and undertaken using the LIEF HPCGPGPU Facility hosted at the University of Melbourne. This facility was established with the assistance of LIEF Grant LE170100200. We would like to thank George Buchanan for providing valuable feedback. References Luiz Henrique Bonifacio, Israel Campiotti, Roberto de Alencar Lotufo, and Rodrigo Frassetto Nogueira. 2021. mMARCO: A multilingual version of MS MARCO passage ranking dataset. CoRR, abs/2108.13897. \ Ilias Chalkidis, Manos Fergadiotis, and Ion Androutsopoulos. 2021. MultiEURLEX - a multi-lingual and multi-label legal document classification dataset for zero-shot cross-lingual transfer. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 6974–6996, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics. 8 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/cont \ Jonathan H. Clark, Eunsol Choi, Michael Collins, Dan Garrette, Tom Kwiatkowski, Vitaly Nikolaev, and Jennimaria Palomaki. 2020. TyDi QA: A benchmark for information-seeking question answering in typologically diverse languages. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 8:454–470. \ Vladimir Karpukhin, Barlas Oguz, Sewon Min, Patrick Lewis, Ledell Wu, Sergey Edunov, Danqi Chen, and Wen-tau Yih. 2020. Dense passage retrieval for opendomain question answering. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 6769–6781, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. \ Omar Khattab and Matei Zaharia. 2020. Colbert: Efficient and effective passage search via contextualized late interaction over BERT. CoRR, abs/2004.12832. \ Philipp Koehn. 2005. Europarl: A parallel corpus for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of Machine Translation Summit X: Papers, pages 79–86, Phuket, Thailand. \ Dawn Lawrie, Eugene Yang, Douglas W. Oard, and James Mayfield. 2023. Neural approaches to multilingual information retrieval. arXiv cs.IR 2209.01335. \ Jimmy Lin, Xueguang Ma, Sheng-Chieh Lin, JhengHong Yang, Ronak Pradeep, and Rodrigo Nogueira. 2021. Pyserini: A Python toolkit for reproducible information retrieval research with sparse and dense representations. https://github.com/ castorini/pyserini. \ Tri Nguyen, Mir Rosenberg, Xia Song, Jianfeng Gao, Saurabh Tiwary, Rangan Majumder, and Li Deng. 2016. MS MARCO: A human generated machine reading comprehension dataset. CoRR, abs/1611.09268. \ Ella Rabinovich, Raj Nath Patel, Shachar Mirkin, Lucia Specia, and Shuly Wintner. 2017. Personalized machine translation: Preserving original author traits. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 1, Long Papers, pages 1074–1084, Valencia, Spain. Association for Computational Linguistics. \ Razieh Rahimi, Azadeh Shakery, and Irwin King. 2015. Multilingual information retrieval in the language modeling framework. Information Retrieval Journal, 18:246–281. \ Keshav Santhanam, Omar Khattab, Christopher Potts, and Matei Zaharia. 2022. PLAID: An efficient engine for late interaction retrieval. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, CIKM ’22, page 1747–1756, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery. \ Jörg Tiedemann and Santhosh Thottingal. 2020. OPUSMT – building open translation services for the world. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation, pages 479–480, Lisboa, Portugal. European Association for Machine Translation. \ Eva Vanmassenhove and Christian Hardmeier. 2018. Europarl datasets with demographic speaker information. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation, page 391, Alicante, Spain. \ Denny Vrandeciˇ c and Markus Krötzsch. 2014. ´ Wikidata: A free collaborative knowledge base. Communications of the ACM, 57:78–85. \ Konrad Wojtasik, Vadim Shishkin, Kacper Wołowiec, Arkadiusz Janz, and Maciej Piasecki. 2023. BEIRPL: Zero shot information retrieval benchmark for the Polish language. arXiv cs.IR 2305.19840. \ Peilin Yang, Hui Fang, and Jimmy Lin. 2017. Anserini: Enabling the use of lucene for information retrieval research. In Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 1253–1256. \ Xinyu Zhang, Xueguang Ma, Peng Shi, and Jimmy Lin. 2021. Mr. TyDi: A multi-lingual benchmark for dense retrieval. arXiv cs.CL 2108.08787. A. Appendix \ \ [8] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/ legal-notice/legal-notice.html

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

Freeter is a free and open-source app that helps you organize your work. It lets you switch between multiple workflows in a single place. Freeter has been released as a forever free and [open-source project]:https://freeter.io/?ref=hackernoon.

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

:::info This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license. Authors: (1) Jinrui Yang, School of Computing & Information Systems, The University of Melbourne (Email: [email protected]); (2) Timothy Baldwin, School of Computing & Information Systems, The University of Melbourne and Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence, UAE (Email: (tbaldwin,trevor.cohn)@unimelb.edu.au); (3) Trevor Cohn, School of Computing & Information Systems, The University of Melbourne. ::: Table of Links Abstract and Intro Background and Related Work Multi-EuP Experiments and Findings Language Bias Discussion Conclusion, Limitations, Ethics Statement, Acknowledgements, References, and Appendix 5 Language Bias Discussion In light of our findings in a one-vs-many setting, we were keen to delve further into the underlying causes of the disparity between languages. 5.1 Bias Detection Language bias is likely if the query language aligns better with one document language than another. As mentioned earlier, Pyserini supports different tokenizers, specifically language-specific tokenizers or simple whitespace tokenization. Therefore, in the one-vs-many setting, we analyze the composition of the top-100 rankings for the 100 topics. During indexing of the document collection, we used the simple whitespace tokenizer, given the multilingual nature of the collection. However, over the queries during retrieval, we employed two different tokenizers — a language-specific tokenizer, and the whitespace tokenizer. \ We conducted a correlation analysis between the language of the topics and the language of the top 100 relevant documents. From Table 2, we can see that relevance judgments in our test cases are consistent across languages, ensuring uniformity in the correlation matrix within the test set. However, Figure 2 reveals that both approaches generate strong language bias. In both cases, the query language aligns better with documents in its own language than others. The right plot appears to show that languages from the same family has strong correlation (e.g., PL, CS) and (IT, ES) since they may have some shared vocabulary. 5.2 Collection Distribution Factors Initially, we hypothesized that the disparity for each language may be a contributing factor to this bias. Figure 3 presents the regression line between the number of documents in a given language and MRR, which explains much of the variation across languages. \ However, note the outlier above the regression line (Polish: PL), which has a substantial number of documents but surprisingly low MRR performance. We refer to this phenomenon as a “BM25 unfriendly” language. According to Wojtasik et al. (2023), the main reason for the low performance of Polish lies in its highly-inflected morphology, giving rise to a a multitude of word forms per lexeme, including inflections of proper names, and complex morphological structure. In such cases, lexical matching is less effective than in other morphologically-simpler languages. Furthermore, LUCENE 8.5.1 API does not have a language-specific tokenizer for Polish. Conversely, languages below the regression line can be termed “BM25 friendly” languages, as they require fewer documents to achieve higher MRR in retrieval. 5.3 Language Tokenizer Factors Secondly, we speculated that the choice of language-specific Analyzer in LUCENE might be a contributing factor, as it influences word tokenization, token filter, synonym expansion and other processing. [7] To investigate this, we conducted a controlled experiment in the one-vs-many setting. When indexing the collection, given the multilingual nature of the collection, we employed whitespace as the tokenizer. However, over the queries, we experimented with either a language-specific tokenizer or whitespace tokenizer. We then compared the linear regression of MRR against the number of documents in Figure 3. On the right side of the plot, we can see a strong correlation when using whitespace tokenization for both the collection and the queries, reducing language bias. \ Furthermore, when transitioning from languagespecific tokenizers to whitespace tokenizers, the overall MRR across all languages declined modestly, from 15.02 to 14.18. That is, the original performance level was largely preserved, but language bias was diminished in using simple whitespace tokenization. \ \ [7] https://lucene.apache.org/core/800/core/ org/apache/lucene/analysis/package-summary.html# package.description

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

E Money Network is one of the world’s first blockchains to comply with MiCA regulations. MiCA is a framework that came into force in June 2023 to regulate the crypto market across Europe. The emergence of MiCA makes one thing clear - that crypto-assets are here to stay.

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

SuiVision Explorer is an intuitive portal tailored for developers and retail users. It marks a significant advancement in blockchain explorers by combining detailed data insights with a user-friendly interface. BlockVision provides robust and scalable RPC nodes and indexing APIs for most of the top protocols on the Sui Network.

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

:::info This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license. Authors: (1) Jinrui Yang, School of Computing & Information Systems, The University of Melbourne (Email: [email protected]); (2) Timothy Baldwin, School of Computing & Information Systems, The University of Melbourne and Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence, UAE (Email: (tbaldwin,trevor.cohn)@unimelb.edu.au); (3) Trevor Cohn, School of Computing & Information Systems, The University of Melbourne. ::: Table of Links Abstract and Intro Background and Related Work Multi-EuP Experiments and Findings Language Bias Discussion Conclusion, Limitations, Ethics Statement, Acknowledgements, References, and Appendix 4 Experiments and Findings \ We conduct preliminary experiments in both one-vs-one and one-vs-many settings, as described above. \ Methods We base our experiments on BM25 with default settings (k1 = 0.9 and b = 0.4), a popular traditional information retrieval baseline. Our implementation is based on Pyserini (Lin et al., 2021), which is built upon Lucene (Yang et al., 2017). Notably, the latest LUCENE 8.5.1 API offers language-specific tokenizers, [6] covering 19 out of the 24 languages present in Multi-EuP. For the remaining languages — namely Polish (PL), Croatian (HR), Slovak (SK), Slovenian (SL), and Maltese (MT) — we use a whitespace tokenizer. \ \ \ MRR@k denotes MRR computed at a depth of k results. Note that the higher the number the better, and that a perfect retriever achieves an MRR of 1 (assuming every query has at least one relevant document). The choice of setting k = 100 aligns with prior endeavors over MS MARCO (Nguyen et al., 2016). 4.1 Monolingual IR (one-vs-one) Experimental Setup We first present results over Multi-EuP in a monolingual setting across the 24 different languages. Specifically, we evaluate single-language queries against documents in the same language. In this configuration, we partitioned our original collection of 22K documents into 24 distinct language-specific sub-collections. Table 2 presents the results broken down across languages. \ Results and Findings Table 2 presents the MRR@100 results for BM25 on Multi-EuP. There are two high-level findings: \ First, Multi-EuP is a relatively easy benchmark for monolingual information retrieval, as the MRR@100 is always around 40 or greater (meaning that the first relevant document is in the top-3 results on average). Indeed, the average MRR across the 24 test languages is 49.61. While direct comparison is not possible, it is noteworthy that for Mr. TYDI, the average MRR is 32.1 across 11 languages. Part of this difference can be attributed to the fact that our relevance judgments are not as sparse as theirs. \ \ \ Second, similar to Mr. TYDI, direct comparison of absolute scores between languages is not meaningful in a monolingual setting, as the document collection size differs. 4.2 Multilingual IR (one-vs-many) Experimental Setup In contrast to Mr. TYDI (Zhang et al., 2021), Multi-EuP supports one-vs-many retrieval, and allows us to systematically explore the effect of querying the same document collection with the same set of topics in different languages. This is because we have translations of the topics in all languages, documents span multiple languages, and judgments are cross-lingual (e.g., English queries potentially yield relevant Polish documents). For this experiment, we use the default whitespace tokenizer in the Pyserini library. \ Results and Findings Table 2 presents the MRR results for BM25 for multilingual information retrieval on 100 topics from the Multi-EuP test set. It’s worth noting that these topics have translationequivalent content in the different languages. Consequently, the one-vs-many approach allows us to analyze language bias. We made several key observations: \ First, unsurprisingly, having more relevance judgments tends to improve ranking accuracy. Therefore, when comparing English topics with other languages, English exhibits notably better MRR performance. \ Second, despite there being consistency in the topics, document collection, and relevance judgments, there is a significant disparity in MRR scores across languages, an effect we investigate further in the next section. \ \ [6] Provided by the Anaylzer package in LUCENE. https: //lucene.apache.org/core/851/analyzers-common/ index.html

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

Ivan Drokin discusses the significant impact of AI in biotech and medtech, emphasizing its role in drug discovery, disease diagnostics, and healthcare optimization. He highlights the challenges of sourcing data and navigating regulations but remains optimistic about AI's potential to advance medicine globally. Drokin shares insights from his career transitions, "wow" moments in AI research, and his contributions to AI applications in various domains. He also addresses the ethical and regulatory dimensions of AI development and envisions critical areas where AI will soon make significant strides in biotechnology.

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

Join us for an enlightening conversation with Andrey Nayman, co-founder of Magic Square, as he explores the creation and unique features of a community-driven App Store designed to make using decentralized apps simpler and safer.

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

How to and why: - Find a way to install multiple pythons - Make your python code a python package - Put all your config into a pyproject.toml - Use a virtual environment Use a deterministic locking solution

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

AI adoption brings tremendous benefits but also significant security risks. Adversaries can exploit AI vulnerabilities for financial gain, manipulation, or competitive advantage. Secure AI by identifying risks, protecting data, validating models, and implementing robust incident response plans.

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

Coinbase, the renowned cryptocurrency exchange headquartered in the United States, has recently made waves in the digital currency market with its decision to incorporate QCAD into its platform. This strategic move underscores Coinbase’s commitment to expanding its asset offerings, providing its users with a wider array of trading options. What sets QCAD apart from the […]

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

BlockDAG distinguishes itself in the competitive blockchain technologies. By leading among the top 5 most eco-friendly cryptocurrencies, this innovative platform offers user-friendly tools designed to minimize ecological footprints. Alongside BlockDAG, other notable cryptos like Solana, Cardano, Algorand, and Nano each contribute uniquely to the sustainable blockchain ecosystem with their energy-efficient solutions. Investing in these technologies means […] The post Top 5 Most Eco-Friendly Cryptocurrencies: BlockDAG Stands Out Amidst SOL, ADA, ALGO & Nano With Its Energy-Efficient Solutions appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

As May 1st started, Bitcoin (BTC) faced a new correction that made the price stumble under the $60,000 support level. The flagship cryptocurrency has seen several retraces during this bull cycle, with BTC swiftly recovering the crucial support zones each time. However, in the past 24 hours, the largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization has struggled to regain its momentum. Some analysts believe Bitcoin’s bottom this cycle might be in as this correction officially became its deepest retrace. Related Reading: If History Repeats, This Is How Bitcoin Price Will Perform In The Next 6 Months Is The Bitcoin Bottom Here? In the early hours of Tuesday, Bitcoin started to plunge from the $64,000 price range. As the day continued, BTC prolonged its fall to briefly trading around $59,958 – $59,191 before recovering. This time, the recovery didn’t last long as Bitcoin’s price resumed its downward trajectory to $57,000. In an X thread, crypto trader Milkybull examined some data suggesting the bottom might finally be in. According to the analyst, BTC is “following the 2017 PA.” This would suggest that “either the bottom is in or close.” Moreover, he urged investors to remember that while good news “usually signals the top,” bad news signals a bull market’s bottom. In the thread, the trader pointed out that the Bitcoin Bull Market Support Band indicator historically serves strong support during BTC’s bull cycles. As a result, he considers that the flagship cryptocurrency might “wick through the support and bounce back.” 2024's Bitcoin Bull Market Support Band indicator resembling 2017's. Source: MilkybullCrypto on X According to the analyst, Bitcoin and global liquidity are also strongly correlated, with BTC currently at a level it has previously bounced back from. These bouncebacks initiated “huge rallies across the crypto market” in October 2022 and October 2023. Lastly, the thread highlighted that Bitcoin “is at a critical decision point for the local bottom.” The trader considers that while some call for a $48,000 bottom, the $51,000 support level might be where BTC bounces back to resume its cycle to this cycle’s top. Bitcoin’s Deepest Retrace This Cycle According to crypto analyst and trader Rekt Capital, this correction has officially been the deepest BTC retrace this cycle. Per the post, today’s -23.64% retrace surpasses the -22.91% retrace seen in February 2023. The analyst also compared this cycle’s “Post-Halving” pullback to 2016’s. Moreover, the trader considers that this bullish cycle might be more similar to the 2016 one than investors think. #BTC We are here (orange circle) And we've seen Post-Halving pullbacks like this in the past (e.g. 2016)$BTC #Bitcoin #BitcoinHalving pic.twitter.com/OvOcmJTzFk — Rekt Capital (@rektcapital) May 1, 2024 Previously, Rekt Capital listed three reasons these two cycles might be similar. Per the trader, the resemblances include the “Pre-Halving Re-Accumulation Range Breakout,” the “Pre-Halving Retrace Beginning,” and the “Similar Initial Reaction after the beginning of the Pre-Halving Retrace.” After today’s retrace, the analyst added the “Continued downside in the three weeks after the Halving” as a fourth similarity between the 2016 and 2024 cycles. Like eight years ago, Bitcoin faces an “additional downside below the Range Low of its Re-Accumulation Range” in the three-week window after Bitcoin’s “Halving.” Moreover, the analyst suggests that the current price development comes “as no surprise,” as it mirrors 2016’s “post-Halving Danger Zone.” As of this writing, the flagship cryptocurrency is trading at $57,794.89. This correction represents a 6.2% drop in the past 24 hours. Similarly, BTC is registering 13.4% and 17.7% price decreases in the weekly and monthly timeframes. Related Reading: Bitcoin Price Nosedives, Can Bulls Save The Key Support at $60K? Bitcoin's price performance in the weekly chart. Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView Featured Image from Unsplash.com, Chart from TradingView.com

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

The price of bitcoin is tumbling in the wake of record highs and the “halving” event. The value of the cryptocurrency has now fallen 17 per cent ...

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

... Kong | First Mover. CoinDesk•798 views · 7:15 · Go to channel · Harvest Global CEO on Spot Crypto ETF Listing. Bloomberg Television New 5.4K views.

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

Acala Network, a leading platform within the Polkadot ecosystem, unveils its groundbreaking Sinai Upgrade, marking a significant milestone in its Acala 2.0 initiative.  This upgrade is poised to reshape the decentralized finance (DeFi) landscape by expanding the platform’s multichain capabilities, heralding a new era of interoperability across blockchain networks. At the core of the Sinai […]

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

As the cryptocurrency market anticipates the next Bitcoin (BTC) halving, a significant event meant to reduce the block reward and potentially increase the coin’s price, some are shifting focus. The spotlight is turning towards promising altcoins like Ethereum (ETH) and the innovative Algo token, Option2Trade (O2T), gaining traction as potentially more attractive assets in the […]

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

Audible Tests Lower-Priced Plan in Possible Response to Spotify  Bloomberg

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

... blockchain Talus starting May 1. “Bitcoin is not only the oldest blockchain but also continues to have the highest liquidity,” Ankr wrote.

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

... blockchains like Ethereum. This content is exclusive for paid members (“Blockchain Believers”); please login to access. (Not a Believer yet? Find ...

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

A draft blockchain adoption strategy, released in October 2020, states that blockchain technology and decentralized ledgers will "facilitate Nigeria's ...

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

Huawei Lab Barred by US Regulators as Part of Crackdown on China  Bloomberg

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

BONK becomes the fifth-largest memecoin, overtaking Floki Inu in market valuation.

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

Tesla (TSLA) Interns Are the Latest Target After Elon Musk’s Layoffs  Bloomberg

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

Record Immigration Levels Collide With Housing Shortages  Bloomberg

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

Oregon joins five other states that have delicensed Binance.US after former Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao pleaded guilty to felony charges.

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

Bitcoin’s prolonged correction is driven by a sharp decrease in demand for nearly all investor cohorts.

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

Fed Day: Jerome Powell Should Listen to Gandalf About 2% Inflation  Bloomberg

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

All eyes now turn to the highly anticipated launch of the Slothana meme coin, set to take place today on Wednesday at 4 PM UTC. Presale buyers will receive their tokens as an airdrop at the same time as the IEO.

a

a

a

a

a

a

Read More

Top 100 Coins By Market Cap

NEXT BTC MOVE:

I think Bitcoin goes UP because

Name Price Marketcap 24h
Bitcoin Bitcoin (BTC) $58,001.96 $1.14 T -3.75%
Ethereum Ethereum (ETH) $2,974.02 $363.01 B -0.50%
Tether USDt Tether USDt (USDT) $0.99849026 $110.43 B -0.01%
BNB BNB (BNB) $557.80 $82.32 B -3.43%
Solana Solana (SOL) $133.69 $59.79 B 6.19%
USDC USDC (USDC) $1.00 $33.03 B 0.01%
XRP XRP (XRP) $0.51516679 $28.46 B 3.58%
Dogecoin Dogecoin (DOGE) $0.12920504 $18.62 B -2.45%
Toncoin Toncoin (TON) $4.87 $16.91 B -4.55%
Cardano Cardano (ADA) $0.45016069 $16.05 B 2.52%
Shiba Inu Shiba Inu (SHIB) $0.00002246 $13.23 B 0.57%
Avalanche Avalanche (AVAX) $33.13 $12.55 B 1.95%
TRON TRON (TRX) $0.12003000 $10.49 B 0.81%
Polkadot Polkadot (DOT) $6.91 $9.91 B 10.70%
Bitcoin Cash Bitcoin Cash (BCH) $421.90 $8.29 B -2.21%
Chainlink Chainlink (LINK) $13.28 $7.78 B 1.67%
Polygon Polygon (MATIC) $0.68900000 $6.81 B 4.21%
NEAR Protocol NEAR Protocol (NEAR) $6.12 $6.54 B -0.30%
Internet Computer Internet Computer (ICP) $13.12 $6.06 B 2.31%
Litecoin Litecoin (LTC) $79.82 $5.94 B 0.69%
UNUS SED LEO UNUS SED LEO (LEO) $5.85 $5.42 B 0.12%
Dai Dai (DAI) $0.99967674 $5.35 B -0.02%
Uniswap Uniswap (UNI) $7.02 $4.20 B -0.26%
First Digital USD First Digital USD (FDUSD) $0.99860000 $4.19 B 0.05%
Aptos Aptos (APT) $8.79 $3.76 B 4.40%
Ethereum Classic Ethereum Classic (ETC) $25.40 $3.72 B 0.04%
Hedera Hedera (HBAR) $0.10015905 $3.58 B 6.72%
Cronos Cronos (CRO) $0.12586013 $3.34 B -4.57%
Cosmos Cosmos (ATOM) $8.55 $3.34 B 5.24%
Stellar Stellar (XLM) $0.11020000 $3.18 B 3.20%
Stacks Stacks (STX) $2.15 $3.12 B 0.16%
Filecoin Filecoin (FIL) $5.68 $3.10 B 1.56%
Mantle Mantle (MNT) $0.94689925 $3.09 B -0.56%
Render Render (RNDR) $7.63 $2.95 B 4.98%
Pepe Pepe (PEPE) $0.00000697 $2.93 B 5.70%
Hedera Hashgraph Hedera Hashgraph (HBAR) $0.10000000 $3.58 B 7.48%
Immutable Immutable (IMX) $2.01 $2.93 B 6.71%
OKB OKB (OKB) $48.62 $2.92 B -1.94%
Optimism Optimism (OP) $2.67 $2.79 B 13.90%
Arbitrum Arbitrum (ARB) $1.03 $2.73 B 2.88%
Sui Sui (SUI) $1.14 $2.67 B 1.21%
dogwifhat dogwifhat (WIF) $2.61 $2.60 B 5.73%
Bittensor Bittensor (TAO) $383.44 $2.56 B 0.00%
VeChain VeChain (VET) $0.03525000 $2.56 B -2.06%
Kaspa Kaspa (KAS) $0.10881554 $2.56 B -0.99%
Maker Maker (MKR) $2,695.00 $2.49 B 1.83%
The Graph The Graph (GRT) $0.24391550 $2.31 B 3.59%
Monero Monero (XMR) $123.11 $2.27 B 3.92%
Injective Injective (INJ) $23.63 $2.21 B 0.08%
Theta Network Theta Network (THETA) $2.03 $2.03 B 0.43%
Arweave Arweave (AR) $28.88 $1.90 B -5.15%
Fantom Fantom (FTM) $0.66223336 $1.86 B 2.69%
Celestia Celestia (TIA) $9.68 $1.75 B 3.10%
Lido DAO Lido DAO (LDO) $1.93 $1.72 B 4.16%
Core Core (CORE) $1.92 $1.70 B 0.39%
Fetch.ai Fetch.ai (FET) $2.00 $1.70 B 0.41%
THORChain THORChain (RUNE) $4.85 $1.63 B 1.88%
Bitget Token Bitget Token (BGB) $1.10 $1.54 B -2.26%
FLOKI FLOKI (FLOKI) $0.00015849 $1.52 B 2.32%
Bonk Bonk (BONK) $0.00002325 $1.52 B 5.11%
Sei Sei (SEI) $0.52740000 $1.48 B -3.60%
Render Token Render Token (RNDR) $7.62 $2.94 B 4.63%
Algorand Algorand (ALGO) $0.18080000 $1.47 B 2.87%
Jupiter Jupiter (JUP) $0.95248984 $1.29 B 5.17%
Flow Flow (FLOW) $0.84880713 $1.28 B 1.82%
Gala Gala (GALA) $0.04193000 $1.27 B 2.63%
Beam Beam (BEAM) $0.02381556 $1.26 B 3.67%
Wormhole Wormhole (W) $0.68700124 $1.24 B 15.84%
Aave Aave (AAVE) $83.29 $1.23 B 0.29%
Quant Quant (QNT) $101.00 $1.22 B 1.66%
Bitcoin SV Bitcoin SV (BSV) $58.77 $1.16 B -2.31%
Flare Flare (FLR) $0.02961369 $1.15 B 4.32%
Ethena Ethena (ENA) $0.80000000 $1.14 B -1.17%
Neo Neo (NEO) $16.13 $1.14 B -4.31%
BitTorrent (New) BitTorrent (New) (BTT) $0.00000117 $1.14 B -2.38%
SingularityNET SingularityNET (AGIX) $0.81801000 $1.05 B 0.80%
MultiversX MultiversX (EGLD) $38.55 $1.04 B 2.18%
Pendle Pendle (PENDLE) $4.32 $1.03 B 2.47%
Huobi Token Huobi Token (HT) $0.54690200 $87.04 M -4.81%
Chiliz Chiliz (CHZ) $0.11594000 $1.03 B 8.75%
Axie Infinity Axie Infinity (AXS) $7.04 $1.01 B 5.38%
The Sandbox The Sandbox (SAND) $0.42440000 $957.09 M 2.45%
Akash Network Akash Network (AKT) $4.05 $953.09 M 1.95%
dYdX (Native) dYdX (Native) (DYDX) $2.05 $950.61 M 3.20%
Worldcoin Worldcoin (WLD) $4.65 $931.58 M 2.80%
Starknet Starknet (STRK) $1.25 $913.48 M 7.94%
KuCoin Token KuCoin Token (KCS) $9.47 $907.25 M -1.55%
dYdX dYdX (DYDX) $2.05 $613.83 M 2.77%
Tezos Tezos (XTZ) $0.91800000 $898.97 M 1.34%
eCash eCash (XEC) $0.00004527 $892.74 M -2.64%
Mina Mina (MINA) $0.79994674 $876.95 M 2.17%
EOS EOS (EOS) $0.77940000 $875.03 M 2.85%
Synthetix Synthetix (SNX) $2.65 $869.49 M 1.20%
Conflux Conflux (CFX) $0.21710000 $854.55 M 1.08%
Ronin Ronin (RON) $2.60 $833.71 M 1.64%
JasmyCoin JasmyCoin (JASMY) $0.01655700 $816.45 M -1.56%
Helium Helium (HNT) $5.06 $814.08 M -0.94%
Decentraland Decentraland (MANA) $0.42384726 $808.84 M 2.66%
Gnosis Gnosis (GNO) $312.70 $806.90 M 0.78%
Pyth Network Pyth Network (PYTH) $0.52240000 $782.62 M 1.78%
Oops... No coins found!

Try to search another coin

no-coins
Signals Portfolio Coins
Menu